Here are some of the interesting things I learned on Twitter. This week I’m featuring my colleagues at the Internet Time Alliance.
—
I remarked earlier in the week that “crowds don’t need wise contributors, but diverse & independent ones; it’s like evolution: simple mechanisms create complexity.”
—
We learn through idle chatter, so it seems (via @shareski):
@charlesjennings
“if it’s social & engaged there is no us & them, only we”
“It’s not the channel that empowers or dis-empowers the learner. It’s the presence or absence of the ‘course and curriculum’ chains”
“True knowledge exists in knowing that you know nothing” – Socrates
@c4lpt (Jane Hart)
The Changing Face of Learning & Development
@jaycross
“I think of crowd sourcing as tapping the wisdom of the crowd, not getting one idea by asking a large group.”
Go straight to the finish line
Jay’s book on working/learning smarter in the cloud
@Quinnovator (Clark Quinn)
“lesson from Twitter (for web, mobile design), you don’t *need* full sentences, you DO need to communicate”
“as my colleague @hjarche says, “increasingly, work is learning and learning is work” [yes, I already knew that]
@jonhusband
The HR Problem: the traditional organization is a machine and we are human
The Problem with the Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom Hierarchy
The temporary and flexible hierarchies of Fishnet Organizations
—
and I also learned that “eMail Is Where Knowledge Goes to Die” via @elsua