Over the past few months there has been a lot of talk about Klout (www.klout.com) rapidly becoming the default system for measuring Twitter influence, with the company selling promo programmes allowing brands to target top people on Twitter.
However, these is some discussion about its accuracy.
For example, he points out that A-List blogger Robert Scoble with a score of 83 is virtually tied with US President Barack Obama on 86 (apparently the average score is 11). P Morgan Brown has added to this by posting “brands beware, my Klout score is a farce.”
The essence of Brown’s point is that he has a higher score than a lot of well known authors – they may tweet less than him and have a lower score but the reality, which can’t be measured by a computer, is that they have more actual influence than he does.
Our view at Rabbit is that as far as influence measurement systems go, Klout is actually one of the best around. Indeed its even written into some of our contracts as a KPI.
We can also see a clear difference when brands and clients are talked about more on Twitter – for example client (London) Gatwick Airport saw its score increase from 53 to 68 over the past week following disruptions caused by snow, and the use of Twitter as a passenger information tool.
However, Brown in particular makes a good point. Computer generated algorithms sometimes can’t take account of how things are in the real world and any evaluation and sentiment scoring system still requires a certain amount of human intervention and sense checking.
- Influencing Klout. (globalneighbourhoods.net)
- The Numbers Don’t Add Up: Popularity Doesn’t Equal Influence (pop-pr.blogspot.com)
- Got Klout? Megan Berry Talks about Klout at Social Media Camp (techvibes.com)
- Klout is the New Followers Counts (scrapsofmygeeklife.com)